JURIS DAILY VERIFIED SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT ARCHIVE

Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. & Anr.

⚖️ Supreme Court of India (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) | 📅 Date: 02 July 2026 | 📜 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 11950 of 2025 | 2026 INSC 668
Bench Composition: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe
📜 Statutory & Legislative Framework
Act / Legislation: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 & Bar Council of India Rules
Specific Statutory Provision: IBC Section 7, Section 14 & Advocates Act Section 35 (Professional Misconduct)
❓ Core Legal Issue

Whether judicial decisions of NCLT and NCLAT relying on non-existent, fake, and AI-hallucinated case citations generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) are legally sustainable, and directives for BCI disciplinary oversight.

⚖️ Binding Ratio Decidendi (Supreme Court Holding)

The Supreme Court of India set aside orders of NCLT Mumbai and NCLAT, declaring a zero-tolerance policy against citing or relying on fake, non-existent AI-generated precedents. The Court held that any judgment relying on hallucinated material is "no decision in the eyes of law" and amounts to subversion of the rule of law. The Bench directed the Bar Council of India (BCI) to constitute a committee and prescribe strict disciplinary action for advocates submitting unverified AI material.

💡 Key Legal Principles Established